Archive of atom-protocol, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for atom-protocol

Page 3 of 23
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: -1 on the features draft, James M Snell, 09/11/2007
Re: -1 on the features draft, A. Pagaltzis, 09/11/2007
Re: -1 on the features draft, Robert Sayre, 09/11/2007
Re: -1 on features draft, A. Pagaltzis, 09/11/2007
Re: -1 on features draft, James M Snell, 09/11/2007
Breakdown of features, James M Snell, 09/11/2007
-1 on features draft, Joe Gregorio, 09/11/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Joe Gregorio, 09/11/2007
[Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-snell-atompub-feature-09.txt], James M Snell, 09/11/2007
Re: -1 on the features draft, James M Snell, 09/10/2007
Re: -1 on the features draft, Eric Scheid, 09/10/2007
Re: -1 on the features draft, James M Snell, 09/10/2007
RE: -1 on the features draft, Brian Smith, 09/10/2007
Re: -1 on the features draft, James M Snell, 09/10/2007
-1 on the features draft, Robert Sayre, 09/10/2007
-1 on the features draft, Tim Bray, 09/10/2007
Re: Features draft updates, James M Snell, 09/10/2007
RE: Features draft updates, Brian Smith, 09/07/2007
Re: Features draft updates, James M Snell, 09/07/2007
Discovery of APP comment service (was RE: Discovery of APP service documents), Brian Smith, 09/07/2007
Re: Features draft updates, James M Snell, 09/07/2007
Re: Features draft updates, James M Snell, 09/07/2007
RE: Features draft updates, Brian Smith, 09/07/2007
Re: Features draft updates, Andreas Sewe, 09/06/2007
RE: Features draft updates, Joe Cheng, 09/05/2007
Features draft updates, James M Snell, 09/05/2007
[Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-snell-atompub-feature-08.txt], James M Snell, 09/04/2007
RE: Discovery of APP service documents, Brian Smith, 09/01/2007
Re: Discovery of APP service documents, Brendan Taylor, 09/01/2007
Re: Discovery of APP service documents, James M Snell, 09/01/2007
RE: Discovery of APP service documents, Brian Smith, 08/31/2007
Re: Discovery of APP service documents, James M Snell, 08/31/2007
RE: Discovery of APP service documents, Brian Smith, 08/31/2007
RE: Discovery of APP service documents, Joe Cheng, 08/31/2007
Re: Discovery of APP service documents, James M Snell, 08/31/2007
Re: Discovery of APP service documents, Michael Wechner, 08/31/2007
RE: Discovery of APP service documents, Joe Cheng, 08/30/2007
Re: Discovery of APP service documents, James M Snell, 08/30/2007
Re: Discovery of APP service documents, Michael Wechner, 08/30/2007
Discovery of APP service documents, Paul Denning, 08/30/2007
[Fwd: Less drafty: RFC 2617 for OAuth], John Panzer, 08/27/2007
[Fwd: Really early draft: RFC 2617 for OAuth], John Panzer, 08/27/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Nikunj Mehta, 08/27/2007
Re: app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required, A. Pagaltzis, 08/26/2007
Re: app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required, Michael Wechner, 08/26/2007
Re: app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required, Tim Bray, 08/26/2007
Re: app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required, Michael Wechner, 08/26/2007
Re: app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/26/2007
Re: app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required, Julian Reschke, 08/26/2007
app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required, Michael Wechner, 08/26/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Joe Gregorio, 08/25/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, James M Snell, 08/25/2007
Re: 'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST, Teo Hui Ming, 08/25/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Joe Gregorio, 08/25/2007
Re: Features Draft, James M Snell, 08/24/2007
RE: Features Draft, Joe Cheng, 08/24/2007
Features Draft, James M Snell, 08/24/2007
Re: 'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST, Thomas Broyer, 08/24/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Dave, 08/24/2007
Re: 'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST, Teo Hui Ming, 08/24/2007
Re: 'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST, Thomas Broyer, 08/24/2007
Re: 'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST, Teo Hui Ming, 08/24/2007
Re: 'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST, Thomas Broyer, 08/24/2007
'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST, Teo Hui Ming, 08/23/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, James M Snell, 08/23/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Eric Larson, 08/23/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, James M Snell, 08/23/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Mark Nottingham, 08/23/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Daniel E. Renfer, 08/23/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, James Holderness, 08/22/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Thomas Broyer, 08/21/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Nikunj Mehta, 08/21/2007
Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Thomas Broyer, 08/21/2007
Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds, Nikunj Mehta, 08/21/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features onStandards Track, Brian Smith, 08/21/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/20/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Brian Smith, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/20/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joe Cheng, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Tim Bray, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/20/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joe Cheng, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Nikunj Mehta, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Bill de hOra, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/20/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Andreas Sewe, 08/20/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joe Cheng, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Larson, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Bill de hOra, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Bill de hOra, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Bill de hOra, 08/19/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James Holderness, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joshua E Cook, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Julian Reschke, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Julian Reschke, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/18/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joshua E Cook, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joe Cheng, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James M Snell, 08/17/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joe Cheng, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/17/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joe Cheng, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Eric Scheid, 08/17/2007
Re: Reject Duplicate Member (with response 409?), Teo Hui Ming, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Andreas Sewe, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Andreas Sewe, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, A. Pagaltzis, 08/17/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Steven Lees, 08/16/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, James Snell, 08/16/2007
Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, John Panzer, 08/16/2007
RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Joe Cheng, 08/16/2007
Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track, Lisa Dusseault, 08/16/2007
Re: Reject Duplicate Member (with response 409?), Teo Hui Ming, 08/16/2007
Re: Reject Duplicate Member (with response 409?), Keith Fahlgren, 08/15/2007
RE: Reject Duplicate Member (with response 409?), Joe Cheng, 08/15/2007
Reject Duplicate Member (with response 409?), Teo Hui Ming, 08/15/2007
Re: September Atompub interop?, Colm Divilly, 08/15/2007
Re: Which category scheme(s) to support?, Tim Bray, 08/13/2007
RE: Which category scheme(s) to support?, Joe Cheng, 08/13/2007
Re: ETag and Media Resources, Julian Reschke, 08/12/2007
Re: Partial updates recapitulated, James M Snell, 08/09/2007
Re: Partial updates recapitulated, John Panzer, 08/09/2007
RE: ETag vs Last-Modified Conditional PUT, Brian Smith, 08/09/2007
ETag vs Last-Modified Conditional PUT, Brian Smith, 08/09/2007
RE: ETag and Media Resources, Joe Cheng, 08/09/2007
RE: ETag and Media Resources, Brian Smith, 08/09/2007
Re: ETag and Media Resources, Tim Bray, 08/09/2007
Re: ETag and Media Resources, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/09/2007
Re: ETag and Media Resources, Alex Milowski, 08/09/2007
RE: ETag and Media Resources, Brian Smith, 08/09/2007
Re: ETag and Media Resources, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/09/2007
RE: Interop testing report, Joe Cheng, 08/09/2007
Re: Interop testing report, James M Snell, 08/09/2007
Re: ETag and Media Resources, Tim Bray, 08/09/2007
ETag and Media Resources, Alex Milowski, 08/09/2007
Re: Partial updates recapitulated, Oliver Geisser, 08/09/2007
Re: Interop testing report, A. Pagaltzis, 08/09/2007
Re: Interop testing report, James M Snell, 08/08/2007
Re: Interop testing report, John Panzer, 08/08/2007
Re: Interop testing report, Alex Milowski, 08/08/2007
RE: Interop testing report, Joe Cheng, 08/08/2007
Re: Interop testing report, Keith Fahlgren, 08/08/2007
Interop testing report, Tim Bray, 08/08/2007
Partial updates recapitulated, John Panzer, 08/07/2007
Re: tests for today, James M Snell, 08/06/2007
Re: tests for today, Julian Reschke, 08/06/2007
tests for today, Joe Cheng, 08/06/2007
Re: Online APP Interop tomorrow (Monday) afternoon, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/06/2007
Online APP Interop tomorrow (Monday) afternoon, Tim Bray, 08/05/2007
Which category scheme(s) to support?, Joe Cheng, 08/03/2007
Re: Editorial nit in draft-17, Paul Hoffman, 08/03/2007
Re: Editorial nit in draft-17, Tim Bray, 08/03/2007
Re: Editorial nit in draft-17, Julian Reschke, 08/03/2007
Re: Editorial nit in draft-17, Bill de hOra, 08/03/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Roy T. Fielding, 08/02/2007
Re: Weird <content src= values in APP, Brendan Taylor, 08/02/2007
Re: Weird <content src= values in APP, James M Snell, 08/02/2007
Editorial nit in draft-17, Tim Bray, 08/02/2007
Weird <content src= values in APP, Tim Bray, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Tim Bray, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Julian Reschke, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Thomas Broyer, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Julian Reschke, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08/02/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 08/02/2007
RE: lost update detection and DELETE, Joe Cheng, 08/01/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Roy T. Fielding, 08/01/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Tim Bray, 08/01/2007
RE: lost update detection and DELETE, Joe Cheng, 08/01/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Roy T. Fielding, 08/01/2007
Re: lost update detection and DELETE, Tim Bray, 08/01/2007
lost update detection and DELETE, Joe Cheng, 08/01/2007
Re: Interop in Tokyo, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 07/31/2007
September Atompub interop?, Nikunj Mehta, 07/30/2007
Re: APP FAQ, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/25/2007
Re: APP FAQ, A. Pagaltzis, 07/25/2007
Re: APP FAQ, James M Snell, 07/24/2007
RE: APP FAQ, Brian Smith, 07/24/2007
Re: Features Draft - Unofficial Last Call, James M Snell, 07/24/2007
Re: APP FAQ, A. Pagaltzis, 07/24/2007
Re: Features Draft - Unofficial Last Call, James M Snell, 07/24/2007
Re: Features Draft - Unofficial Last Call, A. Pagaltzis, 07/24/2007
Re: Features Draft - Unofficial Last Call, David Powell, 07/24/2007
Re: Today's news..., James M Snell, 07/24/2007
Re: Today's news..., Paul Hoffman, 07/24/2007
Today's news..., Tim Bray, 07/24/2007
Re: Features Draft - Unofficial Last Call, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/24/2007
Features Draft - Unofficial Last Call, James M Snell, 07/24/2007
Re: APP FAQ, Joe Gregorio, 07/24/2007
Re: APP FAQ, Thomas Broyer, 07/24/2007
Re: multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/24/2007
RE: APP FAQ, Brian Smith, 07/24/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, John Panzer, 07/24/2007
RE: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Joe Cheng, 07/24/2007
Re: multipart posts, Thomas Broyer, 07/23/2007
APP FAQ, Tim Bray, 07/23/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, A. Pagaltzis, 07/23/2007
Re: multipart posts, A. Pagaltzis, 07/23/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Tim Bray, 07/23/2007
Re: multipart posts, Mark Baker, 07/23/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, M. David Peterson, 07/21/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, M. David Peterson, 07/21/2007
RE: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Joe Cheng, 07/21/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, M. David Peterson, 07/21/2007
Re: multipart posts, Thomas Broyer, 07/21/2007
Re: multipart posts, A. Pagaltzis, 07/21/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Roy T. Fielding, 07/20/2007
Re: ANN: amplee 0.5.0, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/20/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., A. Pagaltzis, 07/20/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Tim Bray, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Roy T. Fielding, 07/19/2007
RE: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Sean Lyndersay, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Eric Scheid, 07/19/2007
Re: ANN: amplee 0.5.0, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/19/2007
[no subject], Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/19/2007
Re: Collection feed paging implementations, Tim Bray, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07/19/2007
Re: Collection feed paging implementations, Joe Gregorio, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Joe Gregorio, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., A. Pagaltzis, 07/19/2007
Re: Newbie question about PUT for create..., Julian Reschke, 07/19/2007
Newbie question about PUT for create..., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07/19/2007
Collection feed paging implementations, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/19/2007
Re: multipart posts, John Panzer, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, Thomas Broyer, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/18/2007
RE: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Joe Cheng, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, James Holderness, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, John Panzer, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, A. Pagaltzis, 07/18/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, James M Snell, 07/18/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Keith Fahlgren, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/18/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, Bill de hOra, 07/18/2007
Re: multipart posts, A. Pagaltzis, 07/17/2007
Re: multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/17/2007
Re: multipart posts, Kyle Marvin, 07/17/2007
Re: multipart posts, Kyle Marvin, 07/17/2007
Re: multipart posts, Thomas Broyer, 07/16/2007
Re: multipart posts, A. Pagaltzis, 07/16/2007
RE: multipart posts, Joe Cheng, 07/16/2007
Re: multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, James M Snell, 07/16/2007
RE: Slug is a write-only value?, Joe Cheng, 07/16/2007
Re: [ANN] Atomic Client 0.8.0 Available, Alex Milowski, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Bill de hOra, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Daniel Jalkut, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Daniel Jalkut, 07/16/2007
Re: [ANN] Atomic Client 0.8.0 Available, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/16/2007
Re: [ANN] Atomic Client 0.8.0 Available, M. David Peterson, 07/16/2007
Re: [ANN] Atomic Client 0.8.0 Available, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Julian Reschke, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Thomas Broyer, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Bill de hOra, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Thomas Broyer, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Thomas Broyer, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Tim Bray, 07/16/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Eric Scheid, 07/15/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Daniel Jalkut, 07/15/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, Daniel Jalkut, 07/15/2007
Re: Slug is a write-only value?, James M Snell, 07/15/2007
Slug is a write-only value?, Daniel Jalkut, 07/15/2007
Re: multipart posts, A. Pagaltzis, 07/13/2007
Re: multipart posts, A. Pagaltzis, 07/13/2007
[ANN] Atomic Client 0.8.0 Available, Alex Milowski, 07/13/2007
Conflicting text and production for atom:title in app:collection, Andreas Wuest, 07/13/2007
Re: Any Example site to Test APP, Joe Gregorio, 07/12/2007
Re: multipart posts, Joe Gregorio, 07/12/2007
Re: multipart posts, Keith Fahlgren, 07/12/2007
Re: multipart posts, Tim Bray, 07/12/2007
Re: multipart posts, Bill de hOra, 07/12/2007
Re: multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/12/2007
RE: multipart posts, Joe Cheng, 07/12/2007
Re: multipart posts, Bill de hOra, 07/12/2007
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-17.txt, Bill de hOra, 07/12/2007
multipart posts, James M Snell, 07/12/2007
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-17.txt, Joe Gregorio, 07/12/2007
PATCH draft, James M Snell, 07/12/2007
Re: Atom, AtomPub and ATE as a schematron schema, Keith Fahlgren, 07/12/2007
Atom, AtomPub and ATE as a schematron schema, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/12/2007
Re: Any Example site to Test APP, Charles Greer, 07/11/2007
Re: Any Example site to Test APP, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/11/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Kyle Marvin, 07/11/2007
Any Example site to Test APP, Deepak Kukrety, 07/09/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Bill de hOra, 07/09/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Paul Hoffman, 07/08/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Julian Reschke, 07/08/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Roy T. Fielding, 07/08/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Bill de hOra, 07/08/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Paul Hoffman, 07/08/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Bill de hOra, 07/08/2007
Re: draft-16 - recommended or encouraged?, Eric Scheid, 07/07/2007
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-16.txt, Joe Gregorio, 07/07/2007
Re: Accept-Put... just a thought, Julian Reschke, 07/07/2007
Re: Accept-Put... just a thought, John Panzer, 07/07/2007
Re: Accept-Put... just a thought, Julian Reschke, 07/07/2007
Re: Accept-Put... just a thought, David Powell, 07/07/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, Ed Summers, 07/06/2007
Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/06/2007
Critical mass for Aug 6-7?, Tim Bray, 07/06/2007
Re: Interop in Tokyo, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 07/06/2007
Re: Accept-Put... just a thought, Julian Reschke, 07/05/2007
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-16.txt, Paul Hoffman, 07/05/2007
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-16.txt, James M Snell, 07/05/2007
Accept-Put... just a thought, James M Snell, 07/05/2007
Re: Entry Resources, Media Link Entries and Resources, Bill de hOra, 07/05/2007
Re: Entry Resources, Media Link Entries and Resources, Eric Scheid, 07/04/2007
Re: Entry Resources, Media Link Entries and Resources, Tim Bray, 07/04/2007
Entry Resources, Media Link Entries and Resources, Antonio Tapiador del Dujo, 07/04/2007
Re: Interop in Tokyo, Sam Ruby, 07/04/2007
Re: Interop in Tokyo, Tim Bray, 07/03/2007
Re: Interop in Tokyo, James M Snell, 07/03/2007
Re: Interop in Tokyo, Paul Hoffman, 07/03/2007
Re: Interop in Tokyo, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 07/03/2007
Interop in Tokyo, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 07/03/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Tim Bray, 07/02/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Joe Gregorio, 07/02/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/02/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 07/02/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Tim Bray, 07/02/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Joe Gregorio, 07/02/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Michael Wechner, 07/01/2007
RE: Interop Aug. 6-7?, Steven Lees, 06/29/2007
Interop Aug. 6-7?, Tim Bray, 06/29/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, John Panzer, 06/29/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Michael Wechner, 06/29/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/29/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Michael Wechner, 06/29/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, Bill de hOra, 06/29/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, Bill de hOra, 06/29/2007
Re: Up-to-date client?, Eric Larson, 06/28/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Tim Bray, 06/28/2007
Re: Up-to-date client?, Thomas Broyer, 06/28/2007
Re: Up-to-date client?, Tim Bray, 06/28/2007
Re: Up-to-date client?, James M Snell, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, James M Snell, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, Keith Fahlgren, 06/28/2007
Up-to-date client?, Tim Bray, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, A. Pagaltzis, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, John Panzer, 06/28/2007
Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, John Panzer, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, James M Snell, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, Kyle Marvin, 06/28/2007
Re: Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?, Nikunj Mehta, 06/28/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, M. David Peterson, 06/28/2007
Re: app:accept shortcoming, A. Pagaltzis, 06/28/2007
Re: app:accept shortcoming, Joe Gregorio, 06/28/2007
app:accept shortcoming, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/28/2007
Re: Going to turn the switch, Michael Wechner, 06/28/2007
Going to turn the switch, Tim Bray, 06/26/2007
Re: HTTP BoF at IETF Chicago, Julian Reschke, 06/26/2007
Re: HTTP BoF at IETF Chicago, Nikunj Mehta, 06/25/2007
HTTP BoF at IETF Chicago, Mark Nottingham, 06/25/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Stefan Eissing, 06/25/2007
PATCH Draft, James M Snell, 06/25/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/25/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/25/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/25/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Bill de hOra, 06/25/2007
Re: Interpretation re Media Link Entries & Member Resources, Joe Gregorio, 06/25/2007
Re: Interpretation re Media Link Entries & Member Resources, Bill de hOra, 06/25/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Bill de hOra, 06/25/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Bill de hOra, 06/25/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Bill de hOra, 06/25/2007
Re: Interpretation re Media Link Entries & Member Resources, Thomas Broyer, 06/24/2007
Re: Interpretation re Media Link Entries & Member Resources, Eric Scheid, 06/24/2007
Interpretation re Media Link Entries & Member Resources, Tim Bray, 06/24/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/24/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Nikunj Mehta, 06/24/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, A. Pagaltzis, 06/24/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Bill de hOra, 06/24/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, J Wynia, 06/24/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, A. Pagaltzis, 06/23/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, A. Pagaltzis, 06/23/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, James M Snell, 06/23/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, Elliotte Harold, 06/23/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Henry Story, 06/23/2007
PATCH draft, James M Snell, 06/23/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Paul Hoffman, 06/23/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Bill de hOra, 06/23/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Bill de hOra, 06/23/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Julian Reschke, 06/23/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Lisa Dusseault, 06/23/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Lisa Dusseault, 06/23/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, A. Pagaltzis, 06/23/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, A. Pagaltzis, 06/23/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, A. Pagaltzis, 06/23/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Henry Story, 06/22/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, A. Pagaltzis, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Paul Hoffman, 06/22/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/22/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/22/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/22/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/22/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, A. Pagaltzis, 06/22/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, Yaron Goland, 06/22/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Henry Story, 06/22/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Tim Bray, 06/22/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Tim Bray, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, James M Snell, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Tim Bray, 06/22/2007
Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, Mark Nottingham, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Julian Reschke, 06/22/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Cheng, 06/22/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Cheng, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, A. Pagaltzis, 06/22/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, A. Pagaltzis, 06/22/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, A. Pagaltzis, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, A. Pagaltzis, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Tim Bray, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Tim Bray, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Tim Bray, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, A. Pagaltzis, 06/21/2007
Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
The rest of the Security Considerations issues, Paul Hoffman, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Cheng, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Cheng, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Is it just us?, Nikunj Mehta, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Gregorio, 06/21/2007
Re: Is it just us?, Tim Bray, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Is it just us?, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Joe Gregorio, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Lisa Dusseault, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Daniel E. Renfer, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, James M Snell, 06/21/2007

Page 3 of 23
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.