Archive of atom-protocol, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for atom-protocol

Page 4 of 23
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Cheng, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Cheng, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Is it just us?, Nikunj Mehta, 06/21/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Gregorio, 06/21/2007
Re: Is it just us?, Tim Bray, 06/21/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
RE: Is it just us?, Yaron Goland, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Joe Gregorio, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Lisa Dusseault, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Daniel E. Renfer, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, James M Snell, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Joe Gregorio, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, John Panzer, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Hugh Winkler, 06/21/2007
RE: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Jeffrey Winter, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Julian Reschke, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Joe Gregorio, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Alexander Johannesen, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, A. Pagaltzis, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, A. Pagaltzis, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Alexander Johannesen, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Julian Reschke, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Stefan Eissing, 06/21/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, M. David Peterson, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, M. David Peterson, 06/21/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, M. David Peterson, 06/21/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Hilarie Orman, 06/20/2007
RE: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, Joe Cheng, 06/20/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Tim Bray, 06/20/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, Tim Bray, 06/20/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Tim Bray, 06/20/2007
Re: Is it just us?, Tim Bray, 06/20/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, A. Pagaltzis, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Don Park, 06/20/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, A. Pagaltzis, 06/20/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Joe Gregorio, 06/20/2007
Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, A. Pagaltzis, 06/20/2007
Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP, Houghton,Andrew, 06/20/2007
Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, Brendan Taylor, 06/20/2007
RE: Is it just us?, Yaron Goland, 06/20/2007
Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, Nikunj Mehta, 06/20/2007
Question about section 9.3 of APP, Yaron Goland, 06/20/2007
Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM, Yaron Goland, 06/20/2007
Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it, Yaron Goland, 06/20/2007
RE: Is it just us?, Joe Cheng, 06/20/2007
Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?, Yaron Goland, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Don Park, 06/20/2007
Is it just us?, Yaron Goland, 06/20/2007
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-snell-atompub-feature-05.txt], James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, John Panzer, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Thomas Broyer, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, John Kemp, 06/20/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, A. Pagaltzis, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, A. Pagaltzis, 06/20/2007
Re: Socially engineering the protocol name., Thomas Broyer, 06/20/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, J Wynia, 06/20/2007
Socially engineering the protocol name., Matt Harmon, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/20/2007
Re: Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, James M Snell, 06/20/2007
Try to social-engineer the protocol public name?, Tim Bray, 06/20/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Bill de hOra, 06/20/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, A. Pagaltzis, 06/20/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/20/2007
Re: Another interop event?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/20/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, A. Pagaltzis, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/19/2007
Re: Entities in XHTML, A. Pagaltzis, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, A. Pagaltzis, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, A. Pagaltzis, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bob Wyman, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, A. Pagaltzis, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/19/2007
Re: Entities in XHTML, Tim Bray, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/19/2007
Re: Entities in XHTML, Peter Saint-Andre, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/19/2007
RE: Entities in XHTML, Joe Cheng, 06/19/2007
Re: Entities in XHTML, James M Snell, 06/19/2007
Re: Features Draft - versioning features?, James M Snell, 06/19/2007
Entities in XHTML, Joe Cheng, 06/19/2007
Features Draft - versioning features?, Jan Algermissen, 06/19/2007
Re: Another interop event?, DeWitt Clinton, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Julian Reschke, 06/19/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Julian Reschke, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Julian Reschke, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, A. Pagaltzis, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Joe Gregorio, 06/18/2007
Re: Another interop event?, Keith Fahlgren, 06/18/2007
RE: Another interop event?, Joe Cheng, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Hilarie Orman, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Julian Reschke, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Lisa Dusseault, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Paul Hoffman, 06/18/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Lisa Dusseault, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, James M Snell, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Lisa Dusseault, 06/17/2007
Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures, Tim Bray, 06/17/2007
Atom protocol and digital signatures, Sam Hartman, 06/17/2007
Re: Another interop event?, James M Snell, 06/16/2007
Another interop event?, Tim Bray, 06/15/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, A. Pagaltzis, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, James M Snell, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Julian Reschke, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Kyle Marvin, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Joe Gregorio, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Julian Reschke, 06/14/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, A. Pagaltzis, 06/13/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, A. Pagaltzis, 06/13/2007
Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, James M Snell, 06/13/2007
Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Paul Hoffman, 06/13/2007
Re: APP support in Microsoft products such as LiveWriter and Word 2007, Julian Reschke, 06/13/2007
Re: APP support in Microsoft products such as LiveWriter and Word 2007, Julian Reschke, 06/13/2007
Re: APP support in Microsoft products such as LiveWriter and Word 2007, Julian Reschke, 06/13/2007
RE: APP support in Microsoft products such as LiveWriter and Word 2007, Sean Lyndersay, 06/13/2007
Re: APP support in Microsoft products such as LiveWriter and Word 2007, Julian Reschke, 06/13/2007
RE: APP support in Microsoft products such as LiveWriter and Word 2007, Sean Lyndersay, 06/13/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/13/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, Elliotte Harold, 06/13/2007
APP support in Microsoft products such as LiveWriter and Word 2007, Julian Reschke, 06/13/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, A. Pagaltzis, 06/13/2007
Re: Features draft update, James M Snell, 06/11/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, James M Snell, 06/11/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, Elliotte Harold, 06/11/2007
Re: Features draft update, Jan Algermissen, 06/11/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, James M Snell, 06/10/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, James M Snell, 06/10/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/10/2007
Re: APP implementation profiles, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/10/2007
APP implementation profiles, James M Snell, 06/10/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, A. Pagaltzis, 06/08/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, Teo Hui Ming, 06/08/2007
Re: XForms and APP clients, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/08/2007
Re: XForms and APP clients, Thomas Broyer, 06/08/2007
Re: XForms and APP clients, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/08/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, Antonio Tapiador del Dujo, 06/08/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, A. Pagaltzis, 06/08/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, Teo Hui Ming, 06/07/2007
RE: XForms and APP clients, Klotz, Leigh, 06/07/2007
Re: XForms and APP clients, Nikunj Mehta, 06/07/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/07/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, Antonio Tapiador del Dujo, 06/07/2007
Re: Accepting articles and bookmarks, Tim Bray, 06/06/2007
Accepting articles and bookmarks, Antonio Tapiador del Dujo, 06/06/2007
Re: feed level rel="service" ?, James M Snell, 06/05/2007
feed level rel="service" ?, John Panzer, 06/05/2007
Using MS Office 2007 Atom capabilities, Lionel [Over-Blog], 06/05/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Julian Reschke, 06/05/2007
Re: XForms and APP clients, Nikunj Mehta, 06/01/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Paul Hoffman, 05/30/2007
Re: Discussion and errata, Paul Hoffman, 05/30/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Tim Bray, 05/30/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Bill de hOra, 05/30/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Julian Reschke, 05/30/2007
Re: Discussion and errata, Julian Reschke, 05/30/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Joe Gregorio, 05/30/2007
Discussion and errata, Joe Gregorio, 05/30/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Julian Reschke, 05/30/2007
Re: XForms and APP clients, Nikunj Mehta, 05/30/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Julian Reschke, 05/30/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Robert Sayre, 05/29/2007
Re: Introduction's "Facilities for" text reads awkwardly, Robert Sayre, 05/29/2007
Re: Introduction's "Facilities for" text reads awkwardly, Joe Gregorio, 05/29/2007
Re: Slug header vs TEXT, Joe Gregorio, 05/29/2007
Re: Introduction's "Facilities for" text reads awkwardly, A. Pagaltzis, 05/29/2007
Re: Introduction's "Facilities for" text reads awkwardly, A. Pagaltzis, 05/29/2007
Re: Introduction's "Facilities for" text reads awkwardly, Daniel Jalkut, 05/29/2007
Introduction's "Facilities for" text reads awkwardly, Daniel Jalkut, 05/29/2007
Slug header vs TEXT, Julian Reschke, 05/29/2007
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Joe Gregorio, 05/29/2007
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt, Joe Gregorio, 05/29/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Michael Wechner, 05/29/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Robert Sayre, 05/28/2007
RE: Best practices on error reporting?, Joe Cheng, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, James M Snell, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, James M Snell, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, A. Pagaltzis, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, A. Pagaltzis, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Yogesh Mujumdar, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Thomas Broyer, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Julian Reschke, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Eric Scheid, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Yogesh Mujumdar, 05/28/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Robert Sayre, 05/27/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Yogesh Mujumdar, 05/27/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Daniel Jalkut, 05/27/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Robert Sayre, 05/27/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, James M Snell, 05/27/2007
Re: Best practices on error reporting?, Julian Reschke, 05/27/2007
Best practices on error reporting?, Tim Bray, 05/27/2007
Re: Consensus on media-type, Eric Scheid, 05/25/2007
Re: Consensus on media-type, Tim Bray, 05/24/2007
Re: Consensus on media-type, James M Snell, 05/24/2007
Re: Consensus on media-type, Tim Bray, 05/24/2007
Features draft update, James M Snell, 05/24/2007
Re: Consensus on media-type, A. Pagaltzis, 05/24/2007
Re: Consensus on media-type, James M Snell, 05/24/2007
Consensus on media-type, Tim Bray, 05/24/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, James M Snell, 05/24/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, James M Snell, 05/24/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, A. Pagaltzis, 05/24/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Eric Scheid, 05/24/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/24/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Eric Scheid, 05/24/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/23/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, James M Snell, 05/23/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Mark Baker, 05/23/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Bill de hOra, 05/23/2007
Re: TLS issues at the IETF level, Julian Reschke, 05/23/2007
Re: TLS issues at the IETF level, Lisa Dusseault, 05/23/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, A. Pagaltzis, 05/23/2007
Re: TLS issues at the IETF level, Paul Hoffman, 05/23/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Kyle Marvin, 05/23/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, James M Snell, 05/23/2007
Re: Black vs. White; please help, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/23/2007
Black vs. White; please help, Tim Bray, 05/23/2007
Re: TLS issues at the IETF level, James M Snell, 05/23/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, Bill de hOra, 05/23/2007
Re: TLS issues at the IETF level, Robert Sayre, 05/23/2007
Re: TLS issues at the IETF level, Tim Bray, 05/23/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, James M Snell, 05/23/2007
Re: TLS issues at the IETF level, Robert Sayre, 05/23/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Robert Sayre, 05/23/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, Tim Bray, 05/23/2007
TLS issues at the IETF level, Tim Bray, 05/23/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Paul Hoffman, 05/23/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Bill de hOra, 05/23/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Julian Reschke, 05/23/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, Bill de hOra, 05/23/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, James M Snell, 05/23/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, Bill de hOra, 05/23/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Robert Sayre, 05/23/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, James M Snell, 05/22/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, Tim Bray, 05/22/2007
Re: Little media-type thinko, Joe Gregorio, 05/22/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Bill de hOra, 05/22/2007
Little media-type thinko, Tim Bray, 05/22/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Paul Hoffman, 05/22/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Tim Bray, 05/22/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Tim Bray, 05/22/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Joe Gregorio, 05/22/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Paul Hoffman, 05/22/2007
Re: Last (?) steps for the APP document, Joe Gregorio, 05/22/2007
Last (?) steps for the APP document, Paul Hoffman, 05/22/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Bill de hOra, 05/22/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Eric Larson, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Eric Scheid, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Eric Scheid, 05/21/2007
RE: moving entry between collections, Joe Cheng, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 05/21/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Joe Gregorio, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, James M Snell, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Eric Scheid, 05/21/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 05/21/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/21/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, James M Snell, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Thomas Broyer, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Paul Hoffman, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Paul Hoffman, 05/20/2007
Re: Editorial Issue: IANA considerations, Paul Hoffman, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Joe Gregorio, 05/20/2007
Changing the meaning of app:categories without @fixed, Andreas Sewe, 05/20/2007
Editorial Issue: IANA considerations, Julian Reschke, 05/20/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/20/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, Andreas Sewe, 05/20/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, Eric Scheid, 05/20/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, James M Snell, 05/19/2007
Re: Not changing the spec, Andreas Sewe, 05/19/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, Andreas Sewe, 05/19/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, Eric Scheid, 05/18/2007
Re: Next steps for the APP document, Eric Scheid, 05/18/2007
Not changing the spec (was: Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified), Paul Hoffman, 05/18/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, A. Pagaltzis, 05/18/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, James M Snell, 05/18/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, Bill de hOra, 05/18/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, James M Snell, 05/18/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, A. Pagaltzis, 05/18/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, Joe Gregorio, 05/18/2007
Re: 8.3.6: Collection vs. Collection Document, Joe Gregorio, 05/18/2007
Re: Next steps for the APP document, John Panzer, 05/18/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Joe Gregorio, 05/18/2007
Re: Next steps for the APP document, Joe Gregorio, 05/18/2007
Re: Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, A. Pagaltzis, 05/18/2007
Multiple app:categories per Collection and fixed underspecified, Andreas Sewe, 05/18/2007
8.3.6: Collection vs. Collection Document, Andreas Sewe, 05/18/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Julian Reschke, 05/18/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Thomas Broyer, 05/18/2007
Re: Next steps for the APP document, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/18/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/18/2007
Re: Next steps for the APP document, John Panzer, 05/18/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Julian Reschke, 05/18/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/18/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Justin Bonnar, 05/17/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Yogesh Mujumdar, 05/17/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Yogesh Mujumdar, 05/17/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, YAMAMOTO Yohei, 05/17/2007
Re: moving entry between collections, Tim Bray, 05/17/2007
moving entry between collections, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 05/17/2007
Re: Up-to-the-minute version of the current draft rev?, A. Pagaltzis, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Tim Bray, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: Up-to-the-minute version of the current draft rev?, Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), James M Snell, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Tim Bray, 05/17/2007
Re: Good "Getting started with Atom" web resources out there?, John Panzer, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: W3C References, Re: Next steps for the APP document, Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Up-to-the-minute version of the current draft rev?, A. Pagaltzis, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here), Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: 10.2 Collection Member Resource, Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: Content-Type examples, Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: W3C References, Re: Next steps for the APP document, Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: 9.7 "Entry or Member resource", Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: 9.5.1 - incorrect part of speech usage, Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), James M Snell, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Tim Bray, 05/17/2007
Re: Editorial: "Atom Protocol", Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: Editorial: "Atom Protocol", Joe Gregorio, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: Editorial: "Atom Protocol", Paul Hoffman, 05/17/2007
Re: Editorial: uppercase "section", Paul Hoffman, 05/17/2007
Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Paul Hoffman, 05/17/2007
Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here), Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here), Tim Bray, 05/17/2007
Re: 10.2 Collection Member Resource, Tim Bray, 05/17/2007
More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17), Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here), Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: edited, updated, stored, Bill de hOra, 05/17/2007
Content-Type examples, Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: 12.1 production syntax, Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Editorial: "Atom Protocol", Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: 12.1 production syntax, Nikunj Mehta, 05/17/2007
Editorial: uppercase "section", Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: 12.1 production syntax, Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
Re: 9.6.1 - 200 Ok: incomplete response, Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
12.1 production syntax, Nikunj Mehta, 05/17/2007
edited, updated, stored, Nikunj Mehta, 05/17/2007
W3C References, Re: Next steps for the APP document, Julian Reschke, 05/17/2007
10.2 Collection Member Resource, Nikunj Mehta, 05/17/2007
9.7 "Entry or Member resource", Nikunj Mehta, 05/17/2007
9.6.1 - 200 Ok: incomplete response, Nikunj Mehta, 05/17/2007
9.5.1 - incorrect part of speech usage, Nikunj Mehta, 05/17/2007
Re: 8.3.6 The "app:categories" Element, Joe Gregorio, 05/16/2007
Re: 9.5.1 glitch in last example of 9.5.1, Joe Gregorio, 05/16/2007
Re: POST uris in examples inconsistent with example service doc, Eric Scheid, 05/16/2007
Re: 9.5.1 glitch in last example of 9.5.1, Eric Scheid, 05/16/2007
Re: 8.3.6�The "app:categories" Element, Eric Scheid, 05/16/2007
Re: POST uris in examples inconsistent with example service doc, Eric Scheid, 05/16/2007
Re: glitch in last example of 9.5.1, Eric Scheid, 05/16/2007
Re: Editorial glitch, Joe Gregorio, 05/16/2007
Editorial glitch, Tim Bray, 05/16/2007
Re: ACTION: Edit please, James M Snell, 05/16/2007
ACTION: Edit please, Tim Bray, 05/16/2007
Re: Next steps for the APP document, Paul Hoffman, 05/16/2007
Re: Next steps for the APP document, Joe Gregorio, 05/16/2007
Re: trailing consensus call, James M Snell, 05/15/2007
Next steps for the APP document, Paul Hoffman, 05/15/2007
Re: Good "Getting started with Atom" web resources out there?, James M Snell, 05/14/2007
Re: Slug header - speak up, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 05/14/2007
Re: Slug header - speak up, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 05/14/2007
Re: Slug header - speak up, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 05/14/2007
Re: Good "Getting started with Atom" web resources out there?, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 05/14/2007
Re: Slug header - speak up, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 05/14/2007
trailing consensus call, Tim Bray, 05/13/2007
Re: Atom Features Draft, James M Snell, 05/09/2007
Re: Atom Features Draft, Bill de hOra, 05/09/2007
Re: Good "Getting started with Atom" web resources out there?, Keith Fahlgren, 05/09/2007
Good "Getting started with Atom" web resources out there?, John Panzer, 05/08/2007
Re: Atom Features Draft, James M Snell, 05/08/2007
RE: Atom Features Draft, Joe Cheng, 05/08/2007
Atom Features Draft, James M Snell, 05/08/2007
Re: 9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Tim Bray, 05/06/2007
Re: 9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Stefan Tilkov, 05/06/2007
Re: 9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Elliotte Harold, 05/06/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Asbj�rn Ulsberg, 05/06/2007
Re: Any news from the app:categories front?, Andreas Sewe, 05/05/2007
Re: Any news from the app:categories front?, Jan Algermissen, 05/04/2007
RE: Any news from the app:categories front?, Joe Cheng, 05/04/2007
[Fwd: Comments on token based authentication for REST service], John Panzer, 05/04/2007
Re: Any news from the app:categories front?, Jan Algermissen, 05/04/2007
Re: Any news from the app:categories front?, Jan Algermissen, 05/04/2007
Any news from the app:categories front?, Andreas Sewe, 05/04/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Mark Baker, 05/04/2007
Re: A more obscure implementer question, A. Pagaltzis, 05/03/2007
A more obscure implementer question, Charles Greer, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Joe Gregorio, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Tim Bray, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Julian Reschke, 05/03/2007
Re: 9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Charles Greer, 05/03/2007
Re: 9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Nikunj Mehta, 05/03/2007
Re: 9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Thomas Broyer, 05/03/2007
Re: 9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Joe Gregorio, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Bill de hOra, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Nikunj Mehta, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Charles Greer, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Keith Fahlgren, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Thomas Broyer, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Tim Bray, 05/03/2007
9.2 - Content-Location and Location headers upon POST, Nikunj Mehta, 05/03/2007
Re: Question -body of response to a POST, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 05/03/2007
Question -body of response to a POST, Charles Greer, 05/03/2007
[Fwd: Document Action: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC], James M Snell, 05/02/2007
Re: Slug header should have less prescriptive overview?, Asbj�rn Ulsberg, 05/01/2007
Re: Categories document scheme extension, Asbj�rn Ulsberg, 05/01/2007
Re: Categories document scheme extension, James M Snell, 04/30/2007
Re: Categories document scheme extension, Tim Bray, 04/30/2007
Re: Categories document scheme extension, Asbj�rn Ulsberg, 04/30/2007
Re: Slug header - speak up, Asbj�rn Ulsberg, 04/29/2007
Re: Slug header - speak up, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 04/28/2007
RE: Slug header encoding, Joe Cheng, 04/27/2007
Re: Slug header - speak up, James M Snell, 04/27/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, Joe Gregorio, 04/27/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, A. Pagaltzis, 04/27/2007
Slug header - speak up, Tim Bray, 04/27/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, James Holderness, 04/27/2007
RE: Slug header encoding, Joe Cheng, 04/27/2007
Re: A concrete proposal for a wildcard approach to app:categories (long, spec-ready text), Andreas Sewe, 04/27/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, James Holderness, 04/27/2007
RE: Slug header encoding, Joe Cheng, 04/26/2007
RE: Categories language negotiation, Joe Cheng, 04/26/2007
RE: Categories document scheme extension, Joe Cheng, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, James Holderness, 04/26/2007
Re: Categories language negotiation, Eric Scheid, 04/26/2007
Categories language negotiation, Eric Scheid, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, A. Pagaltzis, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, James M Snell, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, Tim Bray, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, A. Pagaltzis, 04/26/2007
Re: Categories document scheme extension, Eric Scheid, 04/26/2007
Re: Categories document scheme extension, Tim Bray, 04/26/2007
Slug header should have less prescriptive overview?, Daniel Jalkut, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, Julian Reschke, 04/26/2007
RE: Categories document scheme extension, Joe Cheng, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, Thomas Broyer, 04/26/2007
A concrete proposal for a wildcard approach to app:categories (long, spec-ready text), Andreas Sewe, 04/26/2007
Re: Remove <accept>entry</accept>? Speak up NOW, Daniel Jalkut, 04/26/2007
Re: Slug header encoding, Daniel Jalkut, 04/26/2007
Re: Accept element, Bill de hOra, 04/26/2007

Page 4 of 23
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.