[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ProtocolDataModel issues
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:10:33PM -0400, Joe Gregorio wrote:
> I would offer the Introspection file as a good place to
> store all such links. The Introspection file was part of
> the protocol at one point, then dropped in the
> name of 'simplifying' the protocol. We should
> consider bringing it back.
How about we fall back to saying: what data do we need to represent?
*Then* we talk about how to get it. You say "a new resource", and I say
"WebDAV properties." But I'd rather defer that argument :-), and just
figure out all the bits we're trying to represent on the server.