Re: ProtocolDataModel issues

[Greg Stein <gstein@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:10:33PM -0400, Joe Gregorio wrote:
>...
> I would offer the Introspection file as a good place to 
> store all such links. The Introspection file was part of 
> the protocol at one point, then dropped in the 
> name of 'simplifying' the protocol. We should
> consider bringing it back.

How about we fall back to saying: what data do we need to represent?

*Then* we talk about how to get it. You say "a new resource", and I say
"WebDAV properties." But I'd rather defer that argument :-), and just
figure out all the bits we're trying to represent on the server.

Cheers,
-g