Re: ProtocolDataModel issues

[Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:23:37 -0700, Greg Stein <gstein@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:10:33PM -0400, Joe Gregorio wrote:
> >...
> > I would offer the Introspection file as a good place to
> > store all such links. The Introspection file was part of
> > the protocol at one point, then dropped in the
> > name of 'simplifying' the protocol. We should
> > consider bringing it back.
> 
> How about we fall back to saying: what data do we need to represent?
> 
> *Then* we talk about how to get it. You say "a new resource", and I say
> "WebDAV properties." But I'd rather defer that argument :-), and just
> figure out all the bits we're trying to represent on the server.

I'll give the 'data model' idea a little more time, but
I honestly haven't seen a lot of traffic on this list
and we might need to make the discussion a bit more
concrete to get more participation.

    -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org