Re: PaceMoveLinkElement

[Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:06:12 -0400, Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMoveLinkElement

This works for me. Even if PaceServiceElement is 
accepted the description of the 'service' element
should go in the format spec, with the possible
values of the 'name' attribute being listed in the
Publishing Protocol.



> 
> == Abstract ==
> 
> Move the definition of the Link element to the Format Spec.
> 
> == Status ==
> 
> Open[[BR]]
> 
> == Rationale ==
> 
> The definition of the document format belongs in the format spec.
> 
> == Proposal ==
> 
> Move the definition of the Link element to the Format Spec.
> 
> == Impacts ==
> 
> Atom Format Spec readers can read one document, and the Atom Protocol
> spec can get out of the format business.
> 
> 



-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org