[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: URI constraints

To: Ezra Cooper <ezra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: URI constraints
From: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:35:18 -0400
Cc: mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>, Greg Stein <gstein@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Reply-to: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:29:44 -0700, Ezra Cooper <ezra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, if I understand this proposal correctly, the server determines what
> "queries" are available, and makes them accessible through explicit
> links. The title "Ordered By Date" has no semantic value to the
> protocol, but a user can identify which collection she wants to
> explore. Is that right?

Yes, that is correct. 

    -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org

References:
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- URI constraints (was: Idioms)
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: URI constraints (was: Idioms)
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: URI constraints (was: Idioms)
  - From: Greg Stein
- Re: URI constraints
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: URI constraints
  - From: Greg Stein
- Re: URI constraints
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: URI constraints
  - From: Ezra Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: URI constraints
Next by Date: Re: Dealing with large collections [Re: URI constraints]
Previous by thread: Re: URI constraints
Next by thread: Re: URI constraints
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread