[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: URI constraints

To: mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: URI constraints
From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:49:24 -0700
Cc: Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>, Greg Stein <gstein@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Oct 11, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:

Going further, I think all or most of the basic publishing tasks (covered in metaWeblog/blogger APIs) should be available through GET/POST/PUT/DELETE, though that approach may require more requests.

+1 -Tim

References:
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Idioms
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- URI constraints (was: Idioms)
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: URI constraints (was: Idioms)
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: URI constraints (was: Idioms)
  - From: Greg Stein
- Re: URI constraints
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: URI constraints
  - From: Greg Stein
- Re: URI constraints
  - From: Robert Sayre

Prev by Date: Re: Dealing with large collections [Re: URI constraints]
Previous by thread: Re: URI constraints
Next by thread: Dealing with large collections [Re: URI constraints]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread