[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XML2004Hackathon

To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XML2004Hackathon
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:30:38 -0400
Cc: steve jenson <stevej@xxxxxxxxxx>, Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20041026002734.97220.qmail@web40829.mail.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <20041026002734.97220.qmail@web40829.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

[see atom-syntax for the rest of this thread]

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

--- Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

However we have a major blogging tool vendor claiming that they plan to ignore that part of the spec which makes the spec not worth the much.

More importantly, restricting what authentication mechanisms people can use is just plain silly.

Perhaps we should take this to atom-protocol?

Yes. Silly. Agreed on all points.

Robert Sayre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XML2004Hackathon
  - From: John Panzer
- Atom Authentication
  - From: Ezra Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: Template representation
Next by Date: Re: Template representation
Previous by thread: Template representation [was Re: Collection Item Represenations]
Next by thread: Atom Authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread