User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
Joe Gregorio wrote:
The only open objections to PaceCategoriesFacet were
to the element names 'site' and 'introspection'. I think
this could go forward on atom-syntax where the element
names will probably get picked apart no matter what
we choose.
The "IntrospectionURI" in the Pace needs to define itself as a Resource,
not an identifier or representation. Otherwise, it seems to reflect
consensus aside from the tag names.
I might as well take this opportunity to formally object to the terms
"PostURI", "EditURI", etc. While they're not technically incorrect, they
encourage language that refers to URIs rather than resources. It's kind
of like writing