Re: Converging?

[Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:35:39 -0500, Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > The only open objections to PaceCategoriesFacet were
> > to the element names 'site' and 'introspection'. I think
> > this could go forward on atom-syntax where the element
> > names will probably get picked apart no matter what
> > we choose.

Looking at this after a few days around other stuff, it seems
refreshingly clean.

One point, e.g. the example in 3.4.3.2, where "The formatting of the
content is determined by the categorization schema chosen.". Shouldn't
there be some nearby reference to that schema? An element stating the
schema URI, maybe? (value="01001000" seems a little lost on its own)

> The "IntrospectionURI" in the Pace needs to define itself as a Resource,
> not an identifier or representation. Otherwise, it seems to reflect
> consensus aside from the tag names.
> 
> I might as well take this opportunity to formally object to the terms
> "PostURI", "EditURI", etc. While they're not technically incorrect, they
> encourage language that refers to URIs rather than resources. It's kind
> of like writing
> 
> RobertName SayreName

Yep, I think you're right. There's enough distraction with URLs
staggering in off the street.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 

http://dannyayers.com