Re: Suggestions for PaceIntrospection

[Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:46:21 -0500, Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the Pace is close to exactly what's needed. Although we may
> disagree about the benefits of enforcing hierarchy in other areas, it
> seems pretty obvious that it's not required for this document.
> 
> I'd like to suggest some small changes:
> 
>    1.) Rename the document element to "service"
>    Introspection doesn't seem quite right. Totally subjective, I know.
> 
>    2.) Change "site" to "workspace"
>    Same semantics, not such a loaded term.

Sure, to both 1 and 2, I'm not tied emotionally to any of the element names.



> 
>    3.) Remove "service" children of <site> and use a single 'href' attr
>    I can't see anything that differentiates the 'feed' and 'post'
>    relations, other than the methods they accept.

I think I've agreed to this in the past, in the context of 
PaceCollectionIdiom, that the feed and post resource
should be the same, so agreed to that point. 

But I disagree on removing the <service> children. As of right now we
do have only a single service (managing entries), but we still
have to add in services for managing users, templates, 
preferences, simple resources, etc. I think that each of those
should be listed here.

    -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org