[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestions for PaceIntrospection
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:46:28 -0500, Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joe Gregorio wrote:
>
> >
> > But I disagree on removing the <service> children. As of right now we
> > do have only a single service (managing entries), but we still
> > have to add in services for managing users, templates,
> > preferences, simple resources, etc. I think that each of those
> > should be listed here.
>
> OK, I agree for templates, preferences, and resources. It occurs to me
> that this problem is why the proposal exists. thinko.
>
> Users don't seem to fit, though. The fact that sending your credentials
> can show you multiple "sites" indicates that user management is
> crosscutting.
Good catch.
How about we just go with the proposal as-is, with your
name changes put in place, and with a note that this
*may* need to be revisited once the interface for
dealing with users is in place?
-joe
--
Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org