Re: WebDAV properties vs. Atom extension elements

[Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:06:35 -0800, Ezra Cooper <ezra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> To put it concisely, I want it to be the case that WebDAV is not
> required for Atom. It's already been agreed that WebDAV should not be
> required for core Atom capabilities. Can we improve that and say that
> WebDAV is not required for core Atom, and not for Atom extensions
> either?

+1

The idea of Atom was that the protocol used the syndication format as
it's basis and thus  the extensibility of the syndication format would
flow into the protocol.

    -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org