[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceSliceAndDice3

To: David M Johnson <Davidm.Johnson@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PaceSliceAndDice3
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:40:32 -0500
Cc: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>, Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

David M Johnson wrote:

+1

PaceSliceAndDice3
+1. I support this.

Ezra

Well, I'm not going to stand in the way of this "emerging consensus", so +1 to a new syndication format (why not just use RSS2?) and a comically broken range header from me as well. Let's keep this WG moving. Can't wait to actually talk about a protocol.

The following Paces can be considered withdrawn:

http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceCollections
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceServiceError
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceChangeProtocolCharter
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PacePubHeaders

Robert Sayre

References:
- PaceSliceAndDice3
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: PaceSliceAndDice3
  - From: David M Johnson

Prev by Date: Re: PaceSliceAndDice3
Next by Date: Re: Collection convergence?
Previous by thread: Re: PaceSliceAndDice3
Next by thread: Re: PaceSliceAndDice3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread