Re: Collection convergence?

[Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:37:24 -0800, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 14, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
> 
> > I think we should delete the sections on "locating" (maybe leave
> > placeholders), delete text on any response code that we assign no
> > additional semantics to (everything but 201, right?), delete the text
> > on expected response codes (I have no idea what that means), delete
> > the text "request/response body constraints" and define new media
> > types if we need them because those aren't Atom documents, delete the
> > section on authentication, and move the SOAP stuff to another document
> > or delete it.
> 
> Uh, I'm lacking a bit of context.  Are these obvious editorial moves,
> or do they fall out of the Slice&Dice Pace, or embryonic proposals to
> be taken up for the next draft... at least a couple of them sound like
> they need some substantive discussion. -Tim

Many of them are 'obvious editorial moves' that fall out of 
adopting PaceSliceAndDice3 and others are just good editorial
cleanup of the current draft structure. 

To be clear though, I wouldn't categorize removing the 
section on authentication and moving the SOAP stuff 
under the banner of 'obvious editorial moves' and I believe
they should have further discussion, not matter how +1
I am on them.

    -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org