[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Collection convergence?

To: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Collection convergence?
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:31:40 -0500
Cc: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>, Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
Reply-to: mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)

Joe Gregorio wrote:

Many of them are 'obvious editorial moves' that fall out of adopting PaceSliceAndDice3 and others are just good editorial cleanup of the current draft structure.

Which of my suggestions "fall out of" adopting PaceSliceAndDice3, and how is that?

Robert Sayre

References:
- Collection convergence?
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Collection convergence?
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Collection convergence?
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Collection convergence?
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Collection convergence?
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Collection convergence?
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: Collection convergence?
Next by Date: adopting PaceSliceAndDice3 (was: Collection convergence?)
Previous by thread: Re: Collection convergence?
Next by thread: adopting PaceSliceAndDice3 (was: Collection convergence?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread