[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: collection typing

To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: collection typing
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:45:44 -0500
Cc: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>, atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

I'd expect that this working group would standardize on some of these instead of expecting client developers to have to target each vendor individually in what would likely be just as much work as implementing all of the Atom API currently specced.

I'm inclined to agree with this assessment. Could you expand on this? I know you've been evaluating APIs, so how did you come to this conclusion?

Robert Sayre

References:
- Re: issue: collection typing
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Next by Date: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Previous by thread: Re: issue: collection typing
Next by thread: issue: setting atom:updated
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread