[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: SOAP requirements

To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:48:47 -0500
Cc: Janne Jalkanen <jalkanen@xxxxxxxxx>, jasnell@xxxxxxxxx, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>, atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

I find the latter extremely worrying given that a number of weblog tool vendors have expressed interest in a SOAP API that this WG has consistently neglected that area of the spec.

Fully agree.

This is a recipe for lack of interoperability and will likely mirror the current landscape in weblog APIs where any developer new to the space has to reverse engineer the behavior of popular client and server tools to know what to implement.

Fully agree.

Robert Sayre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: James M Snell

References:
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Re: issue: collection typing
Next by Date: Re: issue: collection typing
Previous by thread: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Next by thread: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread