[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: SOAP requirements




OK, this qualifies as a good reason to introduce SOAP :-). I would still ask whether or not it could not be done simply by putting the verb in the URI and use basic auth for authentication.


- James M Snell

Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
Some mobile phone clients (like DoJa[1], NTT DoCoMo i-mode Java) can't
send customized HTTP headers. And I've heard there're some mobile
gateway servers that strip out all of them, even if agents can set.

With SOAP version of Atom, you can put HTTP verbs and WSSE auth stuff
into the SOAP envelope.

[1] http://www.doja-developer.net/

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:48:46 +0200
Janne Jalkanen <jalkanen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


The PaceAtomActionHeader does it all for J2ME with a lot less hassle
than SOAP (and has the added advantage of not needing base64).

I don't like SOAP either. Too much excess baggage.

/Janne


On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:56:31 -0800, James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Tim Bray wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2005, at 8:52 PM, James M Snell wrote:
>
>> Better question: why bother with SOAP at all?  Either make the Atom
>> API a SOAP based thing or don't.  I vote for getting rid of the SOAP
>> option altogether unless someone can step up and give a solid defense
>> for why it is absolutely necessary to be able to support such a thing.
>