[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: consensus call on PaceSliceAndDice3

To: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: consensus call on PaceSliceAndDice3
From: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:12:42 -0800
Cc: Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mar 17, 2005, at 9:54 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:

Could the chairs clarify the status of PaceSliceAndDice3? It was never on the issues list, yet it seems to be accepted.

Our take was that it enjoyed rough consensus and should be adopted. Agreed on the issues list, but it grew out discussions of, and mixing of, the items formally in place there. Lots of +1's, no -1's, that's good enough for me. -Tim

References:
- issue: consensus call on PaceSliceAndDice3
  - From: Robert Sayre

Prev by Date: issue: consensus call on PaceSliceAndDice3
Next by Date: Re: Protocol Authentication (was Re: Collection convergence?)
Previous by thread: issue: consensus call on PaceSliceAndDice3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread