[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: Atom does not constrain the form the URIs...

To: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: Atom does not constrain the form the URIs...
From: Mark Baker <distobj@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:37:05 -0500
Cc: Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:51:33PM -0500, Robert Sayre wrote:
> 
> Can I use soap:// URIs?

Sure.  Oh, wait, "soap" isn't a registered scheme, so that's bad.  But
any URI with a registered scheme should be fine.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

Follow-Ups:
- Re: issue: Atom does not constrain the form the URIs...
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann

References:
- issue: Atom does not constrain the form the URIs...
  - From: Robert Sayre

Prev by Date: Re: issue: Collection Document Fidelity
Next by Date: Re: issue: Atom does not constrain the form the URIs...
Previous by thread: Re: issue: Atom does not constrain the form the URIs...
Next by thread: Re: issue: Atom does not constrain the form the URIs...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread