Re: issue: collection typing

[Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> I just read
> http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceTwoProtocolDocs
> and it seems I have some catching up to do on all the
> Paces. 
>
> I'm not really sure I understand the reason for
> creating two docs and it isn't clear what the split
> should be between both docs from the Pace. For
> example, I don't consider creating or fetching
> comments an 'advanced' administrative task. In fact,
> fetching comments really should be part of the format
> spec since it will most likely be done by feed
> readers. 

I find having an admin spec broken out entirely natural for the 
protocol, tho' I'd agree that some requirements might not be in the 
right place right now. But once they're spec'd cohesively, shuffling 
them round in the near-term shouldn't be a problem.

cheers
Bill