[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: setting atom:updated

To: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: setting atom:updated
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:01:05 -0500
Cc: Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Uh, ok. For the record, I'm not bothered by any of recent messages. You can look for technical flaws in protocol by examining messages that start with "issue:". All of them are legitimate, and need to be dealt with.

Robert Sayre

Joe Gregorio wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

References:
- issue: setting atom:updated
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: issue: setting atom:updated
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: issue: setting atom:updated
Next by Date: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Previous by thread: Re: issue: setting atom:updated
Next by thread: issue: Collection Document Fidelity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread