[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: SOAP requirements

To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:01:04 -0500
Cc: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <miyagawa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Janne Jalkanen <jalkanen@xxxxxxxxx>, jasnell@xxxxxxxxx, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>, atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

be productive by helping in fleshing out what is currently an underspecified aspect of the spec.

Hmm. Well, the first order of business would seem to be choosing SOAP 1.1 or SOAP 1.2. It's hard to evaluate the SOAP requirement in any way before we have a more concrete idea of what we want.

Robert Sayre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Tim Bray

References:
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Next by Date: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Previous by thread: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Next by thread: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread