Re: issue: SOAP requirements

To: Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: SOAP requirements
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:35:41 -0500
Cc: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>, Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>, Janne Jalkanen <jalkanen@xxxxxxxxx>, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <miyagawa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, jasnell@xxxxxxxxx, atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Bill de hÓra wrote:

Surrealism objection!

Urk!

The system we've specified to begin with doesn't use HTTP by that criteria. HTTP systems don't put their methods in SOAPAction headers.

But HTTP systems do transfer entity headers, and SOAPAction is an entity header to a generic HTTP system.

We can do this without the SOAPAction in short order. Everybody can win,

Yep.

Robert Sayre

References:
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: James M Snell
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Janne Jalkanen
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Bill de hÓra