Re: SOAP 1.2?

[Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert Sayre wrote:
> Bill de hÓra wrote:
>
> > We can do this without the SOAPAction in short order. 
>
>
> It dawns on me that choosing SOAP 1.2 would make the draft very easy to 
> write. All interactions could be described as the product of the request 
> method and the media type, PUT/DELETE could be accomplished without a 
> base64 penalty by using MTOM (possibly).
>
> I think this editorial strategy would be acceptable to REST-discuss 
> denizens and simultaneously prevent SOAP from appearing to be 
> second-class citizen.
>
> Of course, I am just trying to make my life easier. Thoughts?

Here's a Pace:

http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceReplaceSoapActionWithSoapHeader

it should get across where the SOAP sans SOAPAction notion is going. I 
had it thrown together before I noticed Dare's 1.2 tools ob. Anyone 
should feel free to change it to an earlier SOAP rev if that's what they 
 think is right.

cheers
Bill