Re: SOAP 1.2? (was: issue: SOAP requirements)

[Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Bill de hÓra wrote:
> 
> > 
> > We can do this without the SOAPAction in short
> order. 
> 
> It dawns on me that choosing SOAP 1.2 would make the
> draft very easy to 
> write. All interactions could be described as the
> product of the request 
> method and the media type, PUT/DELETE could be
> accomplished without a 
> base64 penalty by using MTOM (possibly).

Given that SOAP 1.1 is widely adopted while SOAP 1.2
is not [and it is unclear if it will ever be] I'd vote
for the WG to choose SOAP 1.1 





THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #222
I reserve the right to execute any henchmen who appear to be a little too intelligent, powerful, or devious. However if I do so, I will not at some subsequent point shout "Why am I surrounded by these incompetent fools?!"


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/