[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SOAP 1.2?

To: Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SOAP 1.2?
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:13:32 -0500
Cc: atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Reply-to: mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)

Bill de hÓra wrote:

Here's a Pace:

http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceReplaceSoapActionWithSoapHeader

it should get across where the SOAP sans SOAPAction notion is going.

Could we use

{http://www.w3.org/2004/08/representation/http,request-line}?
See: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-rep/#rep-http-headers

or would that actually be harmful?

Robert Sayre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SOAP 1.2?
  - From: Bill de hÓra

References:
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: James M Snell
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Janne Jalkanen
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: issue: SOAP requirements
  - From: Bill de hÓra
- SOAP 1.2? (was: issue: SOAP requirements)
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: SOAP 1.2?
  - From: Bill de hÓra

Prev by Date: Re: SOAP 1.2? (was: issue: SOAP requirements)
Next by Date: Re: SOAP 1.2?
Previous by thread: Re: SOAP 1.2?
Next by thread: Re: SOAP 1.2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread