[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SOAP 1.2?

To: Walter Underwood <wunder@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SOAP 1.2?
From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:50:17 -0800
Cc: atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mar 19, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:

--On March 18, 2005 6:29:48 PM -0500 Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not sure we could normatively cite SOAP 1.1 if we wanted to :/
I don't see any problem with citing a W3C Note

Well, one thing is for sure: that document is guaranteed stable. -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SOAP 1.2?
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann

References:
- Re: SOAP 1.2? (was: issue: SOAP requirements)
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- Re: SOAP 1.2?
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: SOAP 1.2?
  - From: Walter Underwood

Prev by Date: Re: SOAP 1.2?
Next by Date: Re: SOAP 1.2?
Previous by thread: Re: SOAP 1.2?
Next by thread: Re: SOAP 1.2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread