[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: draft posts

To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: draft posts
From: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:29:36 -0500
Cc: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=PF8FIgQptBKnv0JZUwRXih8ucZ0I+3P3DuNdwyLO/x2JzyiGO195bAP+H3tNQhkGzSwHnhRq1UmpVb5mEv/b4x6s6PN6wnHB1lRxJEG1AbDBfsxUOFoO6gN0r9nNINBfwPY8F0ocmA/ulG62jXbPJEic1HQNV+/xbmIyH4f0j5o=
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Reply-to: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:24:07 -0800 (PST), Dare Obasanjo
<kpako@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Works for me.

I have updated PaceEntryState with the new wording.

> The only other thing I'd suggest is changing the name
> to publish-state. This will reduce the temptation to
> fill the enumeration with unrelated and thus
> potentially confusing values.

I don't know, doesn't the value "publish-state" as a
value for an element named "state" seem redundant?

The allowed list of values is already controlled via 
registry, so do we have to worry too much
about poorly chosen values?

   -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org

References:
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Re: issue: draft posts
Next by Date: Re: issue: draft posts
Previous by thread: Re: issue: draft posts
Next by thread: Re: issue: draft posts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread