[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issue: draft posts

To: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: draft posts
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:32 -0500
Cc: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>, Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Joe Gregorio wrote:

Ok, this just seems to be opening a can of worms. I think we should just have the main entry collection. Once a client does a sync then it should know which entries are drafts and can present that list quickly to the user.

That ignores a client developer request[0]. What was wrong with my suggestions?

Robert Sayre

[0] "Drafts are a big deal"
http://inessential.com/?comments=1&postid=2988

Follow-Ups:
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Joe Gregorio

References:
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: issue: draft posts
Next by Date: Re: issue: draft posts
Previous by thread: Re: issue: draft posts
Next by thread: Re: issue: draft posts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread