Re: issue: draft posts

To: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: issue: draft posts
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:23:10 -0500
Cc: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>, David M Johnson <Davidm.Johnson@xxxxxxx>, Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Reply-to: mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)

Joe Gregorio wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:09:10 -0500, Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Any particular reason for not having them in the same namespace?

Revising the Atom Format is out of bounds. Wait for the ink to dry.

I'm not sure why this list keeps designing formats. *shrugs

Robert Sayre

References:
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: issue: draft posts
  - From: Joe Gregorio