[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SOAP 1.2?




Our very-response AD sez:


At 6:55 AM -0500 3/24/05, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
Sure, go ahead and normatively reference 1.1, but please be sure to
explain why 1.2 isn't being referenced.  It would also be nice if words
were included to explain what's needed to move to 1.2 in the future.  In
that case, maybe 1.2 should be listed as an informative reference.

I'm already dealing with someone who's complaining that the BEEP/SOAP
RFC (3288) doesn't reference 1.2.  I'd like to avoid having to deal with
similar objections in atompub if at all possible.

--Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium