Re: draft-sayre-atompub-protocol-basic-00

[Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Tim Bray wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
>
> > I've written up an alternate version of the basic protocol.
>
>
> I actually found I liked the ladder diagrams.  Surprising.
>
> Anyhow...
>
>  >2.4.3 update:
>  >
>  >1. The client PUTs an updated representation to the member's URI.
>  >2. The server responds with a representation of the member's new state.
>
> The server echoes the representation?  Why? Why not just 200 OK.

I glossed over details in the model section. If the server
doesn't wish to echo, it should send 204. Unless we have something 
informative to say in the body... do we?

> 3.1.1.1 You have "start" in one place and "offset" in another.

I implemented this range with 'start' initially, then realized I'd used
'begin' for the date. Also, it's zero-indexed, so offset is kind of
better. I've already fixed this in the submitted draft.

Robert Sayre