Comments (was: issue: collection typing)

[Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> For
> example, I don't consider creating or fetching
> comments an 'advanced' administrative task. In fact,
> fetching comments really should be part of the format
> spec since it will most likely be done by feed
> readers. 

How about this:
<link rel="comments" ...> is where you find comments. When used as a 
child of atom:feed, you get comments on all entries in the feed. When 
used as a child of atom:entry, you get comments on that entry only.

To create comments, you POST to an entry's URI (the same URI you would 
use to edit it... but no one will catch you if you use a different URI 
in public). In the response, you get some headers:

Link: <http://www.example.org/entryX/comments/feed>; rel="feed"
Location: <some optional editable location>;

and maybe a body.

Thoughts?

Robert Sayre