Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway

[Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 6/23/05, James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Proposes that SOAP bindings for Atom not be
> defined as part of the core
> > protocol and that when defined, it should be
> modeled as a "SOAP Gateway
> > for Atom"
> > 
> >
> http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceSOAPGateway
> 
> +1

I assume the main point of this PACE is that SOAP
support not be made manadatory. However what exactly
would this change mean process wise? Will there be a
new atom-protocol-soap list created? Will development
on SOAP bindings for Atom be placed on hold ontil the
protocol work is done in November? 



THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #222
I reserve the right to execute any henchmen who appear to be a little too intelligent, powerful, or devious. However if I do so, I will not at some subsequent point shout "Why am I surrounded by these incompetent fools?!"


		
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com