[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway

To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
From: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:04:52 -0700
Cc: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>, Atom-Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XEkxJRNQJ09S1sUXt/+ZEP6Uw544h14nhGIfXThTpZ5CXIIoWwpxWe2/hMALEJ+HXFrYrz9F+c4w2ooHJBnlDelOBFiUUMtYsg78OExDffvSZSuIEJ9lMolPK0iSwhzCd+MLefLjAkgQtUvu13lnW5cxySm/Wl7bvCJow8d2jL0=
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

I assume the main point of this PACE is that SOAP support not be made manadatory. However what exactly would this change mean process wise? Will there be a new atom-protocol-soap list created? Will development on SOAP bindings for Atom be placed on hold ontil the protocol work is done in November?

Another point, I'd be perfectly happy with a normative reference in the core APP spec to the SOAP binding spec that says if you're gonna use SOAP, you have to do it this way...

- James

References:
- Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
Next by Date: Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
Previous by thread: Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
Next by thread: Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread