Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway

[James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Baker wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:24:17PM -0700, James M Snell wrote:
>  
>
> > I mean that the SOAP interface is likely going to work in a 
> > fundamentally different way that an interface based on HTTP PUT's, 
> > GET's, POST's, etc.
> >    
>
> Ok, then I'm -1 on the pace.  I see no value to defining an alternative
> interface to Atom, especially normatively.  I'd be all for using SOAP
> RESTfully though.
>
> Mark.
>
>  
Like I said in my previous note, I want to wait to see what the MS folks 
come forward with before really digging into this.  It may be that what 
I expect is "likely" may be nothing like what they propose. 

- James