Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway

To: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 19:15:56 -0400
Cc: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>, Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>, Atom-Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404)

James M Snell wrote:

The main points of the PACE are:

-1 for lack of proposal. Write the SOAP draft first. That would be the concrete spec text that's required.

Robert Sayre

References:
- Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- Re: New Proposal: PaceSOAPGateway
  - From: James M Snell