[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl

To: Atom Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:50:13 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Tim Bray wrote:

<co-chair-mode> 3. There is consensus that if we put something about publishing status in the core, it should not be acceptable, just "draft? Yes/No".

s/acceptable/extensible/

sigh.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
  - From: James M Snell

References:
- Consensus call: PacePubControl
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Next by Date: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Next by thread: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread