Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl

[Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>]

On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:04 PM, James M Snell wrote:

> > > <co-chair-mode>
> > > 3. There is consensus that if we put something about publishing   
> > > status in the core, it should not be acceptable, just "draft? Yes/ 
> > > No".
> >
> > s/acceptable/extensible/
> Disagree, I believe that a generic extensible publishing control  
> mechanism should be developed for expressing things like whether  
> trackbacks are enabled, etc.  Draft Yes/No is a separate issue that  
> speaks more about workflow cycle than enabled features / publishing  
> parameters.

Acknowledged, but my reading of the WG is that you're pretty well on  
your own here, most people don't want to get fancy or generic, they  
just to control a few common publishing options.  -Tim