[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl

To: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
From: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:22:05 +1000
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418

On 21/7/05 10:04 AM, "Robert Sayre" <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Suggestion: future proposals should focus on the mechanism first, and
> leave the fields for later.

+1

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
  - From: James M Snell

References:
- Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
  - From: Robert Sayre

Prev by Date: Re: APP Meta-discussion
Next by Date: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Next by thread: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread