[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl

To: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
From: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:27:38 -0700
Cc: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lFPXQFUHlAZJb9zz9DPz02re4kmuKHo9svDyUZQPRbNFOTfVMvikDledoGmRCW0WaMdo4E0TbCIPT+4EclVImiZYEiAQScoc91gamVeWQBPdDqHv/vuwyE/PQ4AIdzOY1LzSUeowZBHdFmZT+6FW/Q0mWKLTB9H7W6X+RbBWlVY=
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)

Eric Scheid wrote:

On 21/7/05 10:04 AM, "Robert Sayre" <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Suggestion: future proposals should focus on the mechanism first, and leave the fields for later.

+1

+1

References:
- Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
  - From: Eric Scheid

Prev by Date: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl
Next by thread: Finding: PacePubStatusResource, PaceControlResource, PaceCollectionProcess
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread