Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl

[Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21/7/05 4:29 AM, "Tim Bray" <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Broyer: good question "Could we please divide up the debate between  *how* to
> apply "control properties" and *which* ones should be in the protocol core?":
> http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg01177.html

+1. I haven't written a pace yet for a means for an editor to signal that
the uploaded entry is a significant update or note because I'd like to put
it inside generalised "control properties" mechanism, but not have the
significant-update-flag pace shot down because I happen to chose the wrong
container method.

e.