Re: Searching for concensus on Pub Control (Re: Consensus call: PacePubControl)

[Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 22/7/05 1:08 AM, "Thomas Broyer" <t.broyer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm not even sure what non-entry members are meant to be... Is APP a
> simpler FTP (where you don't bother creating directories, but you must
> however create collection...) ?

directories can be nested.

can collections be nested?

feeds can be nested if each entry in a given feed is treated as meta-data
for the nested feed, and contains a link to said nested feed.

hmmm ... do we ever want the APP to treat POSTing a <feed> resource to an
endpoint to enable creation of a new feed?

> A photo collection is (in my mind) just a collection of entries whose
> atom:content is a base64-encoded image (or using @src to reference another
> part in a multipart/related structure, what I call Compound Entry),
> because I want to attach a title, a short description, keywords, etc. to
> the photos...

+1 to providing atom:entry for every resource, especially since we have
essentially flat one-level-only directories

e.