[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Open Questions on using the Atom Feed Format for search results

To: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Open Questions on using the Atom Feed Format for search results
From: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:09:17 +1000
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418

On 27/9/05 11:38 AM, "James M Snell" <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I definitely prefer the latter phrasing, "the client MUST NOT presume
> the entry in the feed is a Full Entry"

+1.

e.

References:
- Re: Open Questions on using the Atom Feed Format for search results
  - From: James M Snell

Prev by Date: Re: Open Questions on using the Atom Feed Format for search results
Next by Date: Re: ETag and using Atom as the search result format
Previous by thread: Re: Open Questions on using the Atom Feed Format for search results
Next by thread: FYI: Blog pub:control extensions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread