Re: PaceSimplifyCollections2 update

[Aleksander Slominski <aslom@xxxxxxx>]

James M Snell wrote:

> Btw, it's a bit of a nit but can we *please* use some other term than 
> "search"?  It implies entirely the wrong thing.  What we're doing is 
> filtering the collection set, not searching it.  Perhaps "Filter 
> resources" would be better?

i think both searching and filtering are very closely related especially 
if more of OpenSearch approach is used (consider full text search).

in my experience it makes sense to call it "Search and Filter API" but 
that may be overkill
http://fluency.xspaces.org/2005/03/27/search-and-filter

best,

alek

> Joe Gregorio wrote:
>
> > Updated wording:
> >
> > """Search resources are resources that are identified by URI Templates.
> >  They MUST return Atom Feed Documents as their representation, and 
> > unless
> >  otherwise stated the entries in the document must be ordered by
> > their atom:updated
> >  property, with the most recently updated entries coming first in the
> > document. Clients
> >  MUST NOT assume that the entry returned in the feed is a full 
> > representation
> >  of a member resource. If the entry is an Editable Resource then the
> > client should
> >  perform a GET on the member resource before editing.
> > """
> >
> >   -joe
> >
> > On 9/27/05, Luke Arno <luke.arno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  
> >
> > > On 9/27/05, James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >   
> > >
> > > > Rather than "Full Entry", let's say "clients MUST NOT assume that the
> > > > feed returned in search responses contain complete representations of
> > > > the contained entries"...
> > > >
> > > > a bit more wordy, but a whole lot clearer.
> > > >     
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org
> >
> >  


--
---         Memorable Quote from Firefly (105. Out Of Gas)
-Ship like this, be with you until you die -That's because it's a deathtrap