Re: versioning of introspection documents and backwards/forwards compatibility

[Michael Wechner <michael.wechner@xxxxxxxxx>]

James M Snell wrote:

> No, introspection documents are not versioned, nor should APP attempt to
> do so.  The HTTP Last-Modified and ETag mechanisms are sufficient for
> the purpose of detecting changes.
>  

I am not sure if we misunderstand each other. I am not refering to
the change in content, but to the change of the spec itself.

Thanks

Michi

> - James
>
> Michael Wechner wrote:
>  
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I guess one could consider the introspection document as
> > a published API. From the most recent draft (0.8) it is not clear to me
> > if an introspection document has a version (7.1 Example) or how else
> > will backwards/forwards compatibility handled in the case of the
> > introspection?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Michi
> >
> >    
>
>
>  


--
Michael Wechner
Wyona      -   Open Source Content Management   -    Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com                      http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@xxxxxxxxx                        michi@xxxxxxxxxx
+41 44 272 91 61