[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: versioning of introspection documents and backwards/forwards compatibility


Joe Gregorio wrote:


On 6/6/06, Michael Wechner <michael.wechner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Hi

I guess one could consider the introspection document as
a published API. From the most recent draft (0.8) it is not clear to me
if an introspection document has a version (7.1 Example) or how else
will backwards/forwards compatibility handled in the case of the
introspection?


Do we need verbage like that of Section 6.2 in the Format spec?
Along with whatever the syntax wg have learned since that shipped, if anything - ie there was an argument about attribute placement for feed thread, I don't know if anything in terms of guidance came out of that. 

cheers
Bill