[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Synchronization and offline clients

To: "James M Snell" <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Synchronization and offline clients
From: "Robert Sayre" <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:15:36 -0400
Cc: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oZ0mQudRbP1GUIDkn6i2/BXOSzB8qrHSw5nm8vYYrqFDkC1Ct3rqFlXWVNg+sipDFFzyt8KSU8/FNU/D34vvX6jmBCeAAnP3GgP69OiN/T+MLsb0KACAcudbviEHrKGOdUacqhmsmMYzPwZ0Runr5VUNY2BZNCi19ruRT0wIC9g=
In-reply-to: <44AED87D.3070205@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <44AED87D.3070205@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx


On 7/7/06, James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


To wrap up I want to emphasize that I am NOT proposing that this be
discussed in the APP spec.  What I want is a separate draft.

Thoughts? Gripes?


You're right to not worry about it in the APP draft. However,
timestamps are irrelevant to syncing. Most efforts will probably look
something like Microsoft ActiveSync and/or Newsgator.

--

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."

References:
- Synchronization and offline clients
  - From: James M Snell

Prev by Date: Re: Survey on the terms "Introspection" and "Services"
Next by Date: Re: posted PaceOrderCollectionsByAppModified
Previous by thread: Synchronization and offline clients
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread